“The micro-diffuser, meanwhile, allows larvae that do not go to the surface to catch an air bubble in the bottom or middle of the water column. Furthermore, upwelling movement from the center, which is induced by upwards bubbles, can contribute to evacuate oil towards the tank wall, then to the absorbent sock considering the circular flow,” he said.
Laramée presented the study at Aquaculture Europe 2016 held last fall in Edinburgh. He has a masters studying Intensive Walleye Culture in RAS from the Université Laval and is currently working on his PhD in aquaponics, also at the same institution.
The non-inflation of gas bladders in walleye in RAS has been identified as a deterrent in raising this species.
The study noted that while this and other problems have been “broadly solved” using specific tank culture techniques, gas bladder inflation problems continue to be an issue in RAS.
Being physoclistous, walleye’s gas bladder and digestive tract are only temporarily connected to each other during the first few day’s post-hatch.
“To inflate the gas bladder, physoclistous fish have only a short window of time to catch an air bubble at the surface of the water. If the surface water is contaminated by bacteria or fungi, the gas bladder’s duct may be infected which, in turn, affects its inflation,” he said.
Being negatively phototactic is another critical trait. “A too high light intensity may keep larvae away from the surface.”
The study tested four treatments for their potential to promote GBI of walleye larvae:
• A low outflow 90° surface water spray, generally used in flow-through tank culture to emulsify oil film induced by intensive feeding
• A high outflow 90° surface water spray
• A commercial oil absorbent sock combined with a low outflow 90° surface water spray
• An in-tank micro-diffuser to provide air bubbles for larvae under the surface, combined with a low outflow 90° surface water spray.
At the end of the study, a higher proportion of larvae with a fully inflated gas bladders were observed in tanks with micro-diffusers (67 ± 9 %) and oil absorbent socks (66 ± 5 %). High and low-surface water sprays posted lower proportions at 58 ± 4% and 39 ± 7 %).
The experimental treatments did not affect water quality nor larvae growth. All water parameters were similar among treatments.
— Ruby Gonzalez